On Saturday, 20 December 2014 at 00:15:21 UTC, MarcelDuchamp wrote:
You've forget the array of ref version. (append the address of the first data)
What "array of ref" version? Sounds like it would be a different data structure, which would be beyond the scope the topic.
And adding S to an array is biased. S is fucking only >>8<< bytes. add more data to your struct.
Adding a hundred more bytes to S didn't change the relative outcome for me. At a thousand more bytes the second version (appending an array literal) faints, and the others are closer together, but the relative order stays the same.
