happy hacking! ;-)
Thanks once again! I think this mostly solves it. Would it be possible to somehow do the same trick with this()? (I guess due to having to write Type!() when default template arguments are omitted?)
aldanor via Digitalmars-d-learn Wed, 24 Dec 2014 19:11:57 -0800
happy hacking! ;-)
Thanks once again! I think this mostly solves it. Would it be possible to somehow do the same trick with this()? (I guess due to having to write Type!() when default template arguments are omitted?)