On Friday, 30 January 2015 at 18:46:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> there is no such benefit with reverse, so there's no need to
> return anything.
Still, returning the original range would help with chaining
calls:
arr.reverse.map!sqrt
Side note: There is the confusion between the .reverse property
of arrays and std.algorithm.reverse. :-/
Ali
Thanks all, I now understand why this happens, although as a
newcomer, it seems a little odd that these 'utility functions'
have to be handled differently.
Paul
