On Saturday, 7 February 2015 at 23:06:15 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Saturday, 7 February 2015 at 22:46:56 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:1.0 is famously not representable exactly.1.0 is representable exactly, though.
I think he meant 0.1 :-)
On Saturday, 7 February 2015 at 23:06:15 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Saturday, 7 February 2015 at 22:46:56 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:1.0 is famously not representable exactly.1.0 is representable exactly, though.
I think he meant 0.1 :-)