On Sunday, 8 February 2015 at 16:28:21 UTC, fra wrote:
On Sunday, 8 February 2015 at 16:22:36 UTC, fra wrote:
Missclick... Anywya:
class Something
{
@disable this();
this(int i) {}
}
produces an undefined reference error.
I guess it has to do with classes implicitly inheriting from
Object, and Object defining a this(), and @disable telling the
compiler not to produce code for the given function.
However making it a compiler error would be far, far better
then getting the linker error. In my case, the mangled name was
100% unintelligible (the usual "_ctor" was nowhere to be found,
probably due to the class name being so long that it was
getting shortened in some way)
No need to use @disable this(); A default constructor will only
be generated when you don't define a constructor yourself.
