On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:52:02 +0000, Andrey Derzhavin wrote:

> If we can't relay on GC wholly, there is no need for GC.
> All of the objects, that I can create, I can destroy manually by myself,
> without any doubtful GC destroying attempts.

sure. but when it comes, for example, for big data structures with 
complex cross-references, you'll inevitably found that you either leaking 
memory, or writing your own half-backed semi-working GC realization.

ah, good luck doing effecient refcounting on slices, for example. and 
they aren't even remotely complex.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to