On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:52:02 +0000, Andrey Derzhavin wrote: > If we can't relay on GC wholly, there is no need for GC. > All of the objects, that I can create, I can destroy manually by myself, > without any doubtful GC destroying attempts.
sure. but when it comes, for example, for big data structures with complex cross-references, you'll inevitably found that you either leaking memory, or writing your own half-backed semi-working GC realization. ah, good luck doing effecient refcounting on slices, for example. and they aren't even remotely complex.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature