On Thursday, 26 February 2015 at 15:57:22 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 2/25/15 4:58 AM, Ivan Timokhin wrote:
Tobias Pankrath wrote:
writefln("stack: %s", stack[]); //fine
This call consumes all ranges stored in stack, so they're
empty afterwards.
This has to be a bug. stack[] should produce a range that can
be iterated without destroying the data in the container. If it
doesn't, it should be supported.
-Steve
Haven't looked into it, but I'd rather say that writefln (or
formattedWrite, or what is used) should only take ranges per ref,
if they cannot be copied and cannot be saved.
