Hm... what about:return count < rhs.count ? -1 : count > rhs.count ? 1 : rank < rhs.rank ? -1 : rank > rhs.rank;
Is this more efficient than my version?
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 15:00:35 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
- On opCmp Nordlöw
- Re: On opCmp anonymous via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: On opCmp Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: On opCmp Nordlöw
- Re: On opCmp Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: On opCmp Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn
