On 03/09/2015 03:03 PM, Logan Capaldo wrote:
I just became aware of http://dlang.org/phobos/std_exception.html#.ifThrown . It's neat, but it seems non-obvious to me how lazy + UFCS should work in general.consider void lazily(T)(lazy T expression) { expression(); } It's clear when saying lazily(a.b().c()); that the whole of "a.b().c()" is going to be evaluated lazily. With UFCS though, I'm more unsure: is a.b().c().lazily() -> lazily(a.b().c()) or is it more akin to auto tmp = a.b(); lazily(tmp.c()); If the later is it possible to force the former while still using UFCS, ie is (a.b().c()).lazily() different than a.b().c().lazily()?
You are right. I had the same observation at minute 11:27 below, where I warn against UFCS with assumeWontThrow:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=oF8K4-bieaw#t=687 Ali
