processPointer(&ms); I think doing this way is more descriptive. Now all readers know that ms might be changed inside the function.
Re: function ref param vs pointer param
ref2401 via Digitalmars-d-learn Fri, 24 Apr 2015 06:40:44 -0700
- function ref param vs pointer... ref2401 via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: function ref param v... bearophile via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: function ref par... ref2401 via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: function ref... bearophile via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: function ref param v... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: function ref param v... Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: function ref par... ref2401 via Digitalmars-d-learn