On 05/02/2015 01:56 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> I really don't think that it's reasonable in the general case to
expect to
> be able to guarantee that the capacity of a dynamic array won't change.
Yes, it is very different from other languages like C and C++ that
talking about this behavior is worth it.
The elements are const, the slice is passed by value, but the reserved
capacity disappears:
void foo(const(int)[] b)
{
b ~= 42;
}
a.reserve(milllllion);
assert(a.capacity >= milllllion);
foo(a);
assert(a.capacity == 0); // WAT
Ali
