Re: Template type deduction and specialization

[Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On 05/20/2015 04:10 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 May 2015 at 13:46:22 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
DOC say  `may not have` not `must not have` ;-)

OK, if that's the intent, it needs to be reworded. As it stands, it
looks more like it's saying specialization is not permissible, rather
than what "might" be possible.

That's the only meaning that I get: The doc means "must not". Yet, as 
you've shown, the behavior does not match the doc.

Ali