On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 17:22:17 +0000, Marc Schütz wrote: > On Monday, 29 June 2015 at 11:36:42 UTC, ketmar wrote: >> it doesn't, afair, but it's quite natural. if user type was throwed out >> as unused, it would be very strange to insist on keeping it's >> initialization code. > > Yes, but I would instead expect that the static ctor prevents the type > from becoming unused in the first place.
and i expect it to be thrown away. ;-) as we have module-scope static ctors to initialize various things that should be always initialized. and type static ctor -- by my logic deduction -- should only initialize internal type fields. and why should i even bother to initialize that internal fields if the type is not used anywhere?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
