On Sunday, 19 July 2015 at 10:26:04 UTC, TC wrote:
What is wrong here? Docs or behavior? Tested it on asm.dlang.org where it fails with all compiler versions.
Docs are wrong here. `static opCall` was never intended to be used as constructor and I consider it a bad style in general. This is simply a workaround that people unhappy with lack of default struct constructor used but language actively resists such misusage (`auto s = new S(42)` won't work too btw) and it only causes confusion.
