On Monday, 29 June 2015 at 10:22:10 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Monday, 29 June 2015 at 08:45:15 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Sunday, 28 June 2015 at 17:02:42 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 21:40:49 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I'd have to benchmark it against something, but I'm pretty
sure cerealed is fast.
Faster than msgpack?
I guess I'm going to have benchmark this now... :)
Atila
In release builds, _nearly_. Here's the benchmark program:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/17b0ed9c0204. Results below. msgpack
is... fast. From the docs, cerealed seems to have more features
that I actually use and need though.
Results:
DMD debug:
Cerealed: 4 secs, 987 ms, 700 μs, and 5 hnsecs
MsgPack: 1 sec, 771 ms, 713 μs, and 7 hnsecs
DMD release:
Cerealed: 2 secs, 556 ms, 714 μs, and 6 hnsecs
MsgPack: 1 sec, 89 ms, 561 μs, and 3 hnsecs
GDC debug:
Cerealed: 4 secs, 863 ms, 501 μs, and 1 hnsec
MsgPack: 2 secs, 32 ms, 53 μs, and 1 hnsec
GDC release:
Cerealed: 1 sec, 740 ms, 726 μs, and 4 hnsecs
MsgPack: 1 sec, 20 ms, 287 μs, and 3 hnsecs
LDC debug:
Cerealed: 7 secs, 711 ms, 154 μs, and 4 hnsecs
MsgPack: 3 secs, 694 ms, 566 μs, and 2 hnsecs
LDC release:
Cerealed: 1 sec, 795 ms, 380 μs, and 7 hnsecs
MsgPack: 931 ms, 355 μs, and 5 hnsecs
Before I had time to look into it, somebody graciously optimised
cerealed for me in this PR:
https://github.com/atilaneves/cerealed/pull/6
And now then benchmarks are (dub build --build=release, fastest
of 10 runs for each compiler):
DMD:
Cerealed: 1 sec, 199 ms, 118 μs, and 1 hnsec
MsgPack: 1 sec, 85 ms, and 516 μs
GDC:
Cerealed: 927 ms, 677 μs, and 4 hnsecs
MsgPack: 1 sec, 32 ms, 736 μs, and 5 hnsecs
LDC:
Cerealed: 970 ms, 482 μs, and 6 hnsecs
MsgPack: 896 ms, 591 μs, and 2 hnsecs
Not too shabby!
Atila
