On 31/07/15 13:40, Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Sunday, 26 July 2015 at 12:16:30 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Example:
Unique!Random rng = new Random(unpredictableSeed);
rng.take(10).writeln;
My aim by contrast is to _allow_ that kind of use, but render the original
handle empty when it's done.
`take` stores the range, you can try to use some sort of a weak reference.
Yea, but that's not what I'm trying to achieve. I know how I can pass something
to `take` so as to e.g. obtain reference semantics or whatever; what I'm trying
to achieve is a range that _doesn't rely on the user knowing the right way to
handle it_.
I'll expand on this more responding to Ali, so as to clarify the context of what
I'm aiming for and why.
