On Monday, 3 August 2015 at 08:54:32 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Saturday, 1 August 2015 at 11:47:29 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Yea, but that's not what I'm trying to achieve. I know how I
can pass something to `take` so as to e.g. obtain reference
semantics or whatever; what I'm trying to achieve is a range
that _doesn't rely on the user knowing the right way to handle
it_.
Wrapping a reference to a stack-allocated struct is also
unsafe, so no way for the user to not know about it.
It is now verified as safe by `return ref`.
