On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 12:54:39 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Sunday, 9 August 2015 at 01:29:16 UTC, Christopher Davies
wrote:
[...]
using UFCS (universal function call syntax) you would normally
write that as:
records =records.filter!(r => r[where] == val)();
and then leveraging D's optional parentheses as:
records =records.filter!(r => r[where] == val)
This allows you to chain them along with map, filter, reduce
etc. with ease
e.g.
auto result = someRange.filter!(e
=>e.isFooCompatible).map!(e => foo(e)).map!(e => e.toBar).array;
do you care about the type of result? Not really. It's a range.
meaning you can pass iterate over it, pass it to other
algorithms.
[...]
Type inference is your friend.
auto foo = bar;
will work for any type that does not disallow copying (@disable
this(this); )
To answer your question what you probably want is not
auto records = csvReader!(string[string])(input, null);
if (where != "")
{
records = records.filter!(r => r[where] == val);
}
but:
auto records = csvReader!(string[string])(input, null);
if (where != "")
{
auto filteredRecords = records.filter!(r =>
r[where] == val);
//do something with filteredRecords ...
}
or just
if (where != "")
{
// if you need the result exclude comment below
// or if your operation is for side effects only
// leave it.
/*auto result =*/
csvReader!(string[string])(input, null)
.filter(e =>
somePred(e))
.continueChainingRanges(withSomeArgs)
.untilYoureDone;
}
If you just want a copy of the filtered results
if (where != "")
{
auto result = csvReader!(string[string])(input,
null)
.filter(e => e[where]
== val).array;
// .array causes a separate copy of the values of
the result of csvReader
}
Nic
Thanks so much for the reply. Good to know about UFCS.
The problem is, based on user input, I am optionally filtering a
list, possibly passing it through 0, 1, 2 or more filters based
on their input. Each successive filter runs on either the
original range or the result of the previous filter, if there was
one. Then I want to run a ussr-specified computation on the final
range... So it would be very nice to be able to reassign the
variable after each filter. Is there no good way to do that other
than with Generator?
