This compiles and appears to execute correctly, but if I uncomment the taskPool line I get a compile error message about wrong buffer type. Am I breaking some rule for std.parallelism.amap?

import std.algorithm, std.parallelism, std.range;
import std.stdio;
import std.datetime;
import std.typecons;
import std.meta;

// define some input measurement sample tuples and output metric tuples alias TR = Tuple!(double,"per_sec", double, "per_cycle", long,"raw"); alias TI = Tuple!(long, "proc_cyc", long, "DATA_RD", long, "DATA_WR", long, "INST_FETCH", long, "L1I_MISS", long, "L1I_HIT", long,"L1D_HIT", long, "L1D_MISS"); alias TO = Tuple!(TR,"L1_MISS", TR, "L1_HIT", TR,"DATA_ACC", TR,"ALL_ACC");
const double CYC_PER_SEC = 1_600_000_000;

// various metric definitions
// using Tuples with defined names for each member, and use the names here in the metrics. TR met_l1_miss ( ref TI m){ TR rv; with(rv) with(m) { raw = L1I_MISS+L1D_MISS; per_cycle = cast(double)raw/proc_cyc; per_sec = per_cycle*CYC_PER_SEC;} return rv; } TR met_l1_hit ( ref TI m){ TR rv; with(rv) with(m) { raw = L1I_HIT+L1D_HIT; per_cycle = cast(double)raw/proc_cyc; per_sec = per_cycle*CYC_PER_SEC;} return rv; } TR met_data_acc ( ref TI m){ TR rv; with(rv) with(m) { raw = DATA_RD+DATA_WR; per_cycle = cast(double)raw/proc_cyc; per_sec = per_cycle*CYC_PER_SEC;} return rv; } TR met_all_acc( ref TI m){ TR rv; with(rv) with(m) { raw = DATA_RD+DATA_WR+INST_FETCH; per_cycle = cast(double)raw/proc_cyc; per_sec = per_cycle*CYC_PER_SEC;} return rv; }

// a convenience to use all the metrics above as a list
alias Metrics = AliasSeq!(met_l1_miss,met_l1_hit,met_data_acc,met_all_acc);

void main(string[] argv)
{
        auto samples = iota(1_00);
        auto meas = new TI[samples.length];
        auto results = new TO[samples.length];

        // Initialize some values for the measured samples
        foreach(i, ref m; meas){
with(m){ proc_cyc = 1_000_000+i*2; DATA_RD = 1000+i; DATA_WR= 2000+i; INST_FETCH=proc_cyc/2;
                        L1I_HIT= INST_FETCH-100; L1I_MISS=100;
                                L1D_HIT= DATA_RD+DATA_WR - 200; L1D_MISS=200;}
        }

        std.datetime.StopWatch sw;
        sw.start();

    ref TI getTerm(int i)
    {
        return meas[i];
    }

// compute the metric results for the above measured sample values in parallel
        //taskPool.amap!(Metrics)(std.algorithm.map!getTerm(samples),results);

        TR rv1 = met_l1_miss( meas[0]);
        TR rv2 = met_l1_hit( meas[0]);
        TR rv3 = met_data_acc( meas[0]);
        TR rv4 = met_all_acc( meas[0]);

        // how long did this take
        long exec_ms = sw.peek().msecs;
        writeln("measurements:", meas[0]);
        writeln("rv1:", rv1);
        writeln("rv2:", rv2);
        writeln("rv3:", rv3);
        writeln("rv4:", rv4);
        writeln("results:", results[1]);
        writeln("time:", exec_ms);

}

Reply via email to