On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 18:18:19 UTC, J.Frank wrote:
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 14:48:35 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
import std.stdio;
import std.range;
void foo(I, O)(I in_stream, O out_stream)
if (isInputRange!I &&
isOutputRange!(O, ElementType!I)) {
// in_stream.seek(3); // compile error - good :)
foreach (element; in_stream) {
out_stream.put(element);
}
}
void main(string[] args)
{
// Also consider .byLine, which is faster and risky
foo(stdin.byLineCopy,
stdout.lockingTextWriter);
}
Ali
Uhm... no. That's not a solution to my problem. Ranges are not
(I/O-)streams.
Ranges are streams. file.byLine(Copy) and byChunk are effectively
streams that are ranges.
The only problem with implementing your code in ranges is that
`splitter` requires a forward range, which file-backed ranges
aren't. Otherwise you could do
`file.byChunk(4096).joiner.drop(3).splitter('\n')` to get a
"stream" of lines.
