On Tuesday, 17 November 2015 at 13:49:58 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 November 2015 at 12:41:45 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 November 2015 at 12:22:22 UTC, Marc Schütz
wrote:
In any case, I'd suggest you fix your opIndex(), except if
there's a really good reason it is as it is.
I see. Thanks for the explanation. What would be the easiest
fix for this example?
Do you actually need the opIndex()? If not, just remove it.
I suppose that would be the easiest solution. I think I doesn't
really need to be as it is.
