On Sunday, 22 November 2015 at 00:24:43 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
this is only an error if bounds checking is not turned on.
It's a logic error regardless.

you're going to have to create a wrapper.

Right, I am using a wrapper, and I'm not relying on any behavior of a[3..2] during -boundscheck=off.

How does the runtime know that you're not just
providing it garbage values?

The runtime flags an empty slice as an error here, seemingly without reason, because the slice can't access any element outside of bounds.

However, considering (2U - 3U) > 0, I understand that there is no way to catch this problem without comparing the two bounds. And the comparison is designed to be skippable for speed. Therefore, 3..2 is reasonably flagged as an error.

So, thanks for pointing it it out again!

-- Simon

Reply via email to