On Wednesday, 16 December 2015 at 10:15:49 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 December 2015 at 10:07:38 UTC, Saurabh Das
wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 December 2015 at 09:38:24 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
On 12/16/2015 01:26 AM, Saurabh Das wrote:
struct xlref
{
ushort rwFirst;
ushort rwLast;
ubyte colFirst;
ubyte colLast;
}
struct xlmref
{
ushort count;
xlref reflist;
}
Mac OS X (dmd 2.069.0)
===================
dmd dprob.d
Segmentation fault: 11
Compiler bug. Please report at
https://issues.dlang.org/
Changing the order of the members of xlmref seems to be a
workaround:
struct xlmref
{
xlref reflist;
ushort count;
}
Ali
We are using it to communicate with Excel, so swapping it is
not an option.
I'll report it as a compiler bug. In the meantime, this is a
workaround worked for me:
struct xlref
{
ushort rwFirst;
ushort rwLast;
ubyte[2] cols;
}
Filed: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15455
Under OS, I've selected Mac OS X since only 1 OS selection is
allowed. Is the convention to select 'Other' in cases where
ICEs are observed in multiple OSes?
Thanks,
Saurabh
I think it's more normal to select 'all' once it affects more
than one. OS X only bugs are likely to get less attention because
developers don't necessarily have the necessary machines to
quickly test on. 'other' might be interpreted as something
obscure. I'd say list it as 'all', chances are it crashes the
same on linux as well.
