Re: sliced().array compatibility with parallel?

[Jay Norwood via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 11:21:53 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:

I'd say, if `shared` is required, but it compiles without, then 
it's still a bug.

Yeah, probably so.  Interestingly, without 'shared' and using a 
simple assignment from a constant (means[i]= 1.0;), instead of 
assignment from the sum() evaluation, results in all the values 
being initialized, so not marking it shared doesn't protect it 
from being written from the other thread.  Anyway, the shared 
declaration doesn't seem to slow the execution, and it does make 
sense to me that it should be marked shared.