On Thursday, 25 February 2016 at 07:02:24 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 February 2016 at 17:52:39 UTC, Guillaume
Piolat wrote:
Though it isn't fantastic aliasing-wise on the last octave, I
should try something than power-of-2s next time I need it.
Why would it help to not use 2^n sized tables? I guess you
could compute everything at 88khz and decimate...
We are not talking of the same thing. I was thinking about the
table frequency cutoff which is 2x lower every level of mipmap
