Re: What's the rationale for considering "0x1.max" as invalid ?

[Basile B. via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 19:00:43 UTC, Basile B. wrote:

0x1.max // exponent expected in hex float
0x1 .max // OK
1.max // OK

What's the ambiguity when it's an hex literal ?

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15880