On Friday, 8 April 2016 at 08:44:36 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Friday, 8 April 2016 at 03:20:53 UTC, Puming wrote:
On Friday, 8 April 2016 at 02:49:01 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
[...]
Thanks. I'll adopt this idiom. Hopefully it gets used often
enough to warrent a phobos function :-)
What would such a function look like? I don't think such a
thing could exist. This is more than just an idiom, IMO. It's a
basic principle of ranges that, if not followed, is likely to
produce a broken range and/or one whose front is more expensive
than it needs to be. The trouble is that it isn't necessarily
obvious and is easy to overlook when first implementing a
custom range.
I thought it was just like map!readNext.cache
[...]
