On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 16:04:13 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
BTW, this enumeration looks terrible. I would flag this as
blocking if it were a code review, even in C++.
-Steve
Yeah, I didn't even consider that different versions have
different enum values; that is going to be a really good way to
break backwards compatibility.
Hmm, I wonder if I can make use of UDA and a mixin something like
enum tagINSTALLMESSAGE
{
// 12 others ...
INSTALLMESSAGE_INITIALIZE ,
INSTALLMESSAGE_TERMINATE ,
INSTALLMESSAGE_SHOWDIALOG ,
[greaterThan(500)]
INSTALLMESSAGE_PERFORMANCE ,
[greaterThan(400)]
INSTALLMESSAGE_RMFILESINUSE ,
[greaterThan(450)]
INSTALLMESSAGE_INSTALLSTART ,
[greaterThan(450)]
INSTALLMESSAGE_INSTALLEND ,
}
mixin taggedEnum!tagINSTALLMESSAGE
