On Tuesday, 24 May 2016 at 15:07:55 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, May 24, 2016 10:10:16 Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
A while ago, I discovered that this works.
class C {
union
{
private int _my_var;
public const int my_var;
}
void do_something() { _my_var = 4; }
}
Yeah. That's basically what Rebindable does, though in its
case, it's not really allowing you to mutate any data, just
what the reference refers to. Regardless, it does seem like a
hole in the type system.
- Jonathan M Davis
I don't believe so. H. S. Teoh recently fixed a definite bug when
you have something like:
struct S
{
union
{
int n1;
immutable int n2;
}
}
But I'm pretty sure the case where n2 is const was purposely not
fixed as it doesn't break the type system. The value of a const
variable can be changed at any time out from under you, so a
union of a mutable and const int does not break any type system
guarantees.