On Friday, 3 June 2016 at 21:04:41 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
Thank you ag0aep6g, especially for the missing shared in my
static this !
Since I'm implementing a (hopefully useful) library, it would be
unpleasant for users to have to cast away shared to print the
info.
It works with immutable at the condition that I declare the
toString() method like this
string toString() immutable {...}
There is also no missing opEqual.
Is it possible to instantiate immutable objects by using emplace
and modify the object in the toString() call ? This is to cache
the resulting string to avoid creating a new string at each call.
I would have to cast away the immutable attribute of 'this'. Is
this possible ?
Note that the objects would be instantiated by emplace in a void
array at start up. So the memory is writable.
