On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 17:11:44 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 16:51:20 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
Hmmm...it seems to be missing quite alot though.
You could've mentioned you meant just the winsock modules.
They have not been brought over because they were not
explicitly under an open-source license.
:(
(Sorry I didn't realize they were all only in the winsock module)
Weird that you could include the standard windows module but not
winsock? Also seems odd that a language including bindings to an
operating system api would be a licensing issue.
