On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 14:33:50 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 13:32:00 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Why would we change over when Apache is working quite happily
to serve up static content?
I didn't say that. Rikki did :)
If the official D website doesn't feel like migrating it's own
infrastructure to use D, why would anyone else? Of course
apache works (so does C++), but choosing not to put in the time
to switch says a lot to the rest of the world.
Really? I just don't see it as that big of a deal. Again, three
subdomains are using D right now. So it's not like it's not being
used at all. Moving the website to D just hasn't been a priority
(nor should it be, IMO). Anyone in the community who *does* feel
it's important is certainly free to put together a prototype and
pitch it to the core team. I would ask their thoughts about it
first, though, before embarking on such a project.
