On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 23:11:23 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 22:52:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:30:55 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:24:55 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:18:08 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
it you think that you know the things better than somebody
who actually *lived* there in those times... well, keep
thinking that. also, don't forget to teach physics to
physicians, medicine to medics, and so on. i'm pretty sure
that you will have a great success as a stupidiest comic
they ever seen in their life.
also, don't bother answering me, i won't see it anyway.
Fucking schyzo ;)
Have you took your little pills today ?
Well this is beautiful marketing for the language. At some
point, the leadership will need to put away ideology and get
realistic about what belongs on this site.
I would love to see the forum evolve into something similar to
reddit, where everyone can judge the value of a comment/thread
and off-topic threads (or threads with low-values) get
down-voted very quickly. It might also help to avoid such 50
pages threads (like auto-decoding) as the most-important thread
stays on top and newcomers to the discussion don't have to read
everything to get the gist.
Preliminary documentation work:
https://medium.com/hacking-and-gonzo/how-reddit-ranking-algorithms-work-ef111e33d0d9#.vawc5kat8
And you wan submit the result on Pantallex DFeeds.
The widget on the homepage must use something similar (except for
up/down) votes. So at least 10 replies + something with the age
of the topic. [OT] is usally a good hint about the quality of the
topic but people must remember to add it when they slide.
