On Thursday, 1 September 2016 at 10:38:07 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Thursday, 1 September 2016 at 10:30:12 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
On Thursday, 1 September 2016 at 07:46:04 UTC, qznc wrote:
I find the documentation on MemoryOrder lacking about the
semantics of rel. :(
[0] https://dlang.org/library/core/atomic/memory_order.html
What helped me was to read std::memory_order documentation
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/atomic/memory_order
Yes, but how do they map? Is D's rel = relaxed or release or
acq_rel?
Also, reading C++ documentation should not be required of
course. ;)
MemoryOrder.rel must be std::memory_order::release (70%
confidence)
And std::memory_order::relaxed is MemoryOrder.raw of course (90%
confidence).
