On 9/8/16 6:26 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 09/08/2016 06:22 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 09/08/2016 06:13 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
And
there are still some straggling bugs which cause this message to be
erroneously printed.
I'm pretty sure I've hit one of those :( Can't be certain though until I
examine my specific case further.
Oh, although the whole "selective imports don't import the FQN" is a big
surprise to me. I think at least some of the messages I hit were from
that. (Can't say I'm a big fan of that particular one, but meh,
whatever...)
That is probably a more controversial issue. But I can see why it was done.
What I do agree with is that if you import x.y: z, then you shouldn't be
able to use FQN x.y.foo.
-Steve
