Re: inferred size for static array initialization

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On 10/18/16 6:35 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 2 May 2016 at 17:43:56 UTC, Namespace wrote:
immutable auto a  = [1,2,3].s;

Will that have zero run-time overhead compared to:

    immutable int[3] a = [1,2,3];

Neither will have zero runtime overhead, but use the disassembler to see 
if there is a difference. My understanding is that while the compiler 
used to allocate whenever it saw an array literal (including your above 
usage), that is no longer the case.

-Steve