On Monday, 7 November 2016 at 22:18:56 UTC, Jerry wrote:
On Monday, 7 November 2016 at 21:37:50 UTC, Picaud Vincent wrote:
static if ( isIntegralConstant!(typeof(required_capacity()) )
{
}
else
{
}

}

Premature post send by error sorry.... Well something like:

static if ( isIntegralConstant!(typeof(required_capacity()) )
     ElementType[required_capacity()] data_;
   else
     ElementType[] data_;
}

For that, at least in C++, I need integral_constant<> type with compile-time arithmetic and smooth integration with "usual" size_t/ptrdiff_t types.

2/ I also would like to test some implementations concerning automatic differentiation.
I have my own C++ libs, inspired, but ~20% faster than Adept:
http://www.met.reading.ac.uk/clouds/adept/
and I would like to know how I can do that in D

Well... That is the idea... I hope I will get some results and I will be happy to share if it is something interesting.

Vincent

Ah I get what you mean, you can do that without using a special type.

    struct Vector(T, Args...) if(Args.length == 1)
    {
        static if(is(Args[0] == size_t))
        {
            size_t size;
        }
else static if(Args[0] != 0) // would error if it's a type that's not size_t
        {
            enum size = Args[0];
        }
        else
        {
            static assert(0);
        }
    }

    Vector!(int, 10) a;
    Vector!(int, size_t) b; // both work with IntegralConstant

could use __traits(compiles) to see if it's not a type, for that second static if. Which would probably be better, so if you pass a float or something, it won't give a weird error.

Thank you again Jerry!

For sure my way of thinking is twisted by my C++ habits! :-/

The positive point is that D seems to offer much shorter solutions (this is my hope).

However I still need some investigations and/or some guidance:

-> not sure that it is ok for me as I really want to track "static constants" all the
   way long.
   That is the reason why I introduced the IntegralConstant type
   (with operator overloading, work in progress)

For instance, the code:

 enum int a=1,b=2;
 auto c = a+b;

 pragma(msg,typeof(c));   // prints "int"
static assert(c==3); // compilation fails: "variable c cannot be read at compile time"

To implement my vector structs I need:

1/ a way to detect compile-time constant vs "dynamic" values
2/ to perform and to propagate compile-time constants across "arithmetic" computations. For instance to compute the required capacity to store vector data, I need something
like

auto capacity = max(0,(size_-1)*stride_);

and this expression must make sense for both "dynamic" values and compile-time constant.

In one case I expect
   typeof(capacity) -> int,
in the other
   typeof(capacity) -> IntegralConst

Reply via email to