On Thursday, 10 November 2016 at 20:12:10 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, November 10, 2016 17:41:02 Picaud Vincent via
Digitalmars-d- learn wrote:
It is certainly a compiler problem: I used gdc -> compile
error, but with dmd it compiles and runs fine. Full details in
the git repo.
Don't bother with gdc at this point. Unless there's a
development version of it that's actually up-to-date and hasn't
been released yet, it's too old to be reliable with regards to
what correct D is. If something doesn't work in gdc, it could
easily be because of a bug that has since been fixed.
Unfortunately, the gdc folks have never managed to release an
updated gdc that uses the D version of the compiler front-end,
so as I understand it, they're still stuck at 2.067 (which is
over 2 years old), whereas dmd is now at 2.072. ldc should be
reasonably up-to-date if you want an alternative to dmd, and I
expect that the gdc guys will get there eventually, but they
haven't yet.
- Jonathan M Davis
I just have compiled my example with ldc and everything is ok!
I was not aware of that concerning gdc. Thank you for this
information, I lost around 2 hours struggling with initial code
trying to guess what was wrong.
Conclusion: now I will only use ldc and dmd.
Thanks to Steven too for his clarification concerning
template<->symbol
Vincent
