On 2017-01-09 20:18, Ali Çehreli wrote:
This is something that surprised me in a friend's code.

(A "friend", hmmm? No, really, it wasn't me! :) )

// Some type of the API
struct MyType {
    int i;
}

// Some function of the API that takes a delegate
void call(void delegate(MyType) dlg) {
    dlg(MyType(42));
}

void main() {
    /* The programmer simply copied the delegate definition from
     * the function and used it as-is when passing a lambda: */
    call(delegate void(MyType) {
            /* WAT? Does the following really compile? After all,
             * MyType.i is NOT a static member! */
            if (MyType.i == 42) {
                // ...
            }
        });
}

I was surprised to see it compiled and worked but of course MyType at
the lambda definition inside main() is not a type name, rather the
parameter name. Surprising, but I think this is according to spec.

I know this has come up before, and reported as a bug, at least once. Might have been me :). What's confusing is that using a type that has a keyword will make the parameter unnamed of the specified type, just as a regular function:

auto a = (int) => 3; // works, a lambda taking an int, no parameter name
auto b = (Foo) => 3; // error, cannot infer type of template lambda
alias b = (Foo) => 3; // works, since this is an alias, Foo is the parameter name of an unknown type

--
/Jacob Carlborg

Reply via email to