On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 15:11:40 UTC, albert-j wrote:
Is it possible to refer to an array element by a descriptive name, just for code clarity, without performance overhead? E.g.

void aFunction(double[] arr) {
    double importantElement = arr[3];
    ... use importantElement ...
}

But the above, I suppose, introduces an extra copy operation?

Unless the item type of that array is a complex like a big struct, copying basic types won't have much effect at all. You wouldn't notice it.

You could point to that element with a pointer:

double* importantElement = &arr[3];

But then you are going to define that pointer variable anyway. On top of that, for every access, instead of using the available data, CPU would look at the pointed memory address to get the value again and again (ignoring the cache).

Reply via email to