On Monday, 20 February 2017 at 21:05:17 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Monday, 20 February 2017 at 20:54:31 UTC, Jack Stouffer
wrote:
On Monday, 20 February 2017 at 20:49:43 UTC, Johan Engelen
wrote:
...
Yeah, this is another regression caused by DIP1000.
Christ.
For the record, the current list of regressions caused by
DIP1000
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17213
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17188
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17123
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17117
17117 and 17123 are already fixed on HEAD, no?
So only two regressions remaining - I hope DIP1000 can be used to
build new container libraries soon.
