On Monday, February 27, 2017 14:07:21 Oleg B via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > Hello. Is this behavior normal, or it's a bug? And if it's normal > why it's normal? I want to use function with `package` visibility > in same package where it's defined, but I don't. > > ```d > module package_visible; > package void foo() { } > void main() { foo(); } > ``` > > ``` > % rdmd package_visible.d > package_visible.d(3): Error: function package_visible.foo is not > accessible from module package_visible > Failed: ["dmd", "-v", "-o-", "package_visible.d", "-I."] > ``` > > dmd version v2.073.1
In your example, your module isn't in a package. It's at the top-level. So, package doesn't work, becasue there's no package. In this case, you'd just use private. Presumably, in any actual code, you would have a package rather than putting the module at the top level, and then it would work. - Jonathan M Davis