On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 16:12:06 UTC, bauss wrote:
There is a better binding. dsfml. You can find it here: http://dsfml.com/
DSFML technically is not a binding (even though it says such on the web site). It's a wrapper that D-ifies the SFML API. The SFML functions are not callable directly, as they are all declared privately. DerelictSFML is strictly a binding, with no attempt to wrap anything. A wrapper like DSFML could be implemented on top of DerelictSFML.
So yes, it's better if what you really want is a wrapper.
