Meta wrote:
On Sunday, 12 March 2017 at 20:22:33 UTC, ketmar wrote:
Meta wrote:
The reason this doesn't work is when you use ConstOf!U, it's not
looking for a `const U`, it's looking for the type `ConstOf!U`. I'm not
sure if this is a bug or not...
no, not a bug. this is the way type deconstruction works: it checks if
your type was constructed with a given template.
Yeah, it seems to be checking the pattern rather than the type. However,
ConstOf!T is just an alias for const(T), but the alias does not seem to
be "unwrapped", even though they are supposed to be transparent.
yeah. "eponymous template" trick.
