On Tuesday, 14 March 2017 at 02:14:53 UTC, evilrat wrote:
like this?
--------------------------------------
[snip]
-----------------------------------------
there is also way to do this using templates and duck typing, I
think it will be more idiomatic way since ranges and stuff
heavily use it to provide such generalism, though just like you
say, I would prefer to have strict interface for such use
case...
Yeah, that's the idea. Though I just thought of a possibility
using an isPublicInterface template. Is that what you meant by
templates and duck typing?
