On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 06:51:45PM +0000, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 18:07:09 UTC, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote:
> > Why don't you use -dip1000???
>
> Because it isn't the default. But even if it was, people would ask
> "why is this giving me an error?" and the same explanation would need
> to be given. Certainly, a compile error is better than runtime
> corruption, but the underlying issue ought to be fixed anyway.
Not to mention that even with -dip1000, the fundamental problem still
happens:
int[16] func();
int[] x = func(); // allowed even with -dip1000
x[0] = 123; // this writes to the now out-of-scope rvalue returned by
func()
T
--
Doubtless it is a good thing to have an open mind, but a truly open mind should
be open at both ends, like the food-pipe, with the capacity for excretion as
well as absorption. -- Northrop Frye
