On Wednesday, 10 May 2017 at 10:47:13 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 05/09/2017 01:17 AM, k-five wrote:
> On Monday, 8 May 2017 at 21:37:17 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> On 05/06/2017 02:24 AM, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
>> ------------------------------------------------
Plus, wrapping steps of the same sollution in a function should
not count as a different way. Otherwise, we can have infinite
number of ways of doing the same things. For example, not!empty
is the equivalent of the following function:
auto notEmpty_0(T)(T a) {
return !a.empty;
}
Change 0 above to 1, 2, ... :)
-----------------------------------------------------
Yes you are right. I admit.
