On Friday, 12 May 2017 at 20:53:56 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
Is it safe to say that these 40 lines of D do the same as your
324 lines of C++ [1]?
No. I cannot say that.
Since this is not a full port of renrem in C++ to D. It was just
an example in D, nothing else.
This, and your comments on the difficulties of building renrem
[2] versus doing "rdmd", and the steepness of the learning
curve (1 year C++ vs 2 weeks D), and the productivity (2 hours
D vs ?? C++)
I am not sure about understanding your purpose correctly.
I think are plenty material for a nice little blog.
Which English Grammar rule is used here? Sorry but I do not know!
are: linking verb after
think: main verb and subject!
-------------------------------------------------------
I just want to say D is easy to learn and use; that is it. I have
no arguing about which Language is better no not. Of course that
program with C++, took me 1 month until it got ready, but in 2
days I could ported to D, since I had the already experience of
implementing it.
Mike Parker runs the D blog, and I think he might be
interested. No need to worry about the english language, you
are safe with Mike. I'll see if I can get you his attention.
Sorry ... Still could not understand ... except you may want me
to put such post in D blog not here, and in this case, your are
right, the best way for such examples is on a blog or similar.
Sorry for posting it here.
