On Thursday, 8 June 2017 at 11:41:40 UTC, realhet wrote:
I've managed to narrow the problem even more:
//win32 dmd -O
class Obj{
synchronized void trigger(){ new ubyte[1]; }
}
void main(){
auto k = new shared Obj;
k.trigger;
}
This time I got a more sophisticated error message:
object.Error@(0): Access Violation
----------------
0x7272456D in SymInitialize
0x00402667
0x00402A97
0x00402998
0x004022A0
0x76F13744 in BaseThreadInitThunk
0x773B9E54 in RtlSetCurrentTransaction
0x773B9E1F in RtlSetCurrentTransaction
I can reproduce this under win32, and it breaks somewhere between
2.068.2 and 2.069.0.
The move instructive message with "dmd -O -g":
object.Error@(0): Access Violation
----------------
0x00000065
0x00402C33 in _d_newarrayU
0x004022EB in _d_newarrayT
0x00402A7F in scope void rt.dmain2._d_run_main(int, char**,
extern (C) int function(char[][])*).runAll()
0x00402980 in _d_run_main
0x00402288 in main at C:\a.d(8)
0x757F336A in BaseThreadInitThunk
0x77409902 in RtlInitializeExceptionChain
0x774098D5 in RtlInitializeExceptionChain
Perhaps a regression should be filed, or searched for, at
issues.dlang.org. I can do it, but not right now, and would be
glad if someone beats me to it.
Ivan Kazmenko.
