On Monday, 10 July 2017 at 19:11:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 07/10/2017 11:46 AM, Jean-Louis Leroy wrote:
> Is there something special about ClassInfo that confuses?
Look at this
> example:
>
> struct Foo
> {
>
> }
>
> class Bar
> {
> }
>
> void main()
> {
> Foo*[Bar] a;
> auto aa = a.dup; // OK
> Foo*[ClassInfo] b; // Error: static assert "cannot call
> Foo*[TypeInfo_Class].dup because Foo* is not copyable"
I think you're hitting the same TypeInfo.init issue again. :/
This is the assert that fails inside object.dup:
static assert(is(typeof({ V v = aa[K.init]; })),
"cannot call " ~ T.stringof ~ ".dup because " ~
V.stringof ~ " is not copyable");
Jean-Louis, a little more patience please. :) Hopefully this
will be resolved with 2.075, which you should be able to test
yourself already. (?) 2.075 is in its fourth beta release.
Ali
Howdy Ali ;-)
Aaaah...those rough edges you were talking about at CppNow?
FYI, having a lot of fun. See
https://github.com/jll63/meth.d/blob/experiments/source/meth/examples/adventure.d
At the time being, I'm hijacking ClassInfo.deallocator. I hope it
will live through the next iteration of D.
